This week brought another wave of major developments in the fight for the Second Amendment. From Virginia’s looming “assault firearms” ban heading toward the state’s highest court, to the Department of Justice stepping into local permit disputes, to a federal court striking down one of the Biden administration’s most controversial ATF rules.
The legal landscape surrounding gun rights continues to shift rapidly. Meanwhile, businesses are voting with their feet, and a major challenge to New York’s attempt to bankrupt the firearms industry could soon reach the Supreme Court. Here’s what every gun owner should know from this week’s biggest stories.
Virginia's "Assault Firearms" Ban Heads Toward the State Supreme Court
The battle over Virginia’s sweeping new firearm restrictions continues escalating. This week, Gun Owners of America and Gun Owners Foundation petitioned the Virginia Supreme Court for a preliminary ruling regarding the state’s looming “assault firearms” ban.
At issue are Virginia’s recently enacted restrictions targeting many of the most commonly owned semiautomatic firearms and standard-capacity magazines in America. As we covered previously, these laws prohibit the sale, transfer, manufacture, importation, and purchase of a wide range of firearms. It also restricting magazines capable of holding more than 15 rounds.
The plaintiffs argue the laws violate Article I, Section 13 of the Virginia Constitution, which explicitly protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. What makes this case particularly important is that it may become one of the first major state constitutional challenges to an “assault weapon” ban in the post-Bruen era.
For years, anti-gun states have relied heavily on federal court interpretations when defending firearm restrictions. Now courts are increasingly being asked to examine protections contained within state constitutions as well.
If Virginia’s Supreme Court ultimately sides with gun owners, the ruling could have implications far beyond the Commonwealth. This is a case worth watching closely.
DOJ Puts Philadelphia on Notice Over Carry Permit Delays
In another sign that the federal government is taking a more active role in Second Amendment issues, the Department of Justice has reportedly put Philadelphia officials on notice. This is regarding concerns over concealed carry permit processing.
According to reports, the DOJ is examining allegations that permit applicants are experiencing excessive delays and procedural obstacles. These are delays interfere with their constitutional rights. This marks a notable shift.
Historically, federal intervention in local firearm permitting disputes has been rare. However, following the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision, courts and government agencies are increasingly recognizing that delaying a constitutional right can sometimes be just as problematic as denying it outright.
The core issue is straightforward. If citizens have a constitutional right to bear arms, governments cannot simply create endless bureaucratic hurdles that make exercising that right practically impossible.
Philadelphia now finds itself under growing scrutiny as federal officials evaluate whether local practices comply with constitutional standards. For gun owners nationwide, this could signal that other jurisdictions with lengthy permitting delays may soon face similar questions.
Firearms Manufacturer Leaves Virginia for Georgia
The economic consequences of anti-gun legislation are becoming increasingly difficult for some states to ignore. This week, Rideout Arsenal announced it is relocating operations from Virginia to Georgia, citing Virginia’s increasingly hostile political environment toward the firearms industry.
The move reflects a broader trend that has been developing for years. States pursuing aggressive firearm restrictions often argue such policies have little economic impact. Yet firearm manufacturers, distributors, and related businesses continue relocating to states viewed as more supportive of the Second Amendment.
Georgia, Texas, Tennessee, South Carolina, and several other states have increasingly become destinations for firearm-related businesses seeking friendlier regulatory environments. Virginia’s political transformation over the last decade has made it a particularly interesting case study.
Once considered one of the strongest pro-gun states on the East Coast, Virginia now finds itself passing restrictions that would have been politically unimaginable just a few years ago. The departure of firearm manufacturers may only accelerate if that trend continues. When businesses leave, jobs and tax revenue often follow.
Federal Court Strikes Down Biden ATF "Engaged in the Business" Rule
One of the most significant Second Amendment victories of the week came from a federal courtroom. A federal judge struck down the Biden administration’s controversial ATF “Engaged in the Business” rule, ruling against the agency’s attempt to dramatically expand who could be considered a firearms dealer under federal law.
The rule sought to broaden the circumstances under which private firearm sales could trigger federal licensing requirements. Critics argued the ATF was effectively attempting to rewrite federal law through regulation rather than legislation. Supporters claimed the rule was necessary to close what they described as loopholes in firearm sales. The court disagreed.
The ruling represents another major setback for Biden-era firearm regulations, many of which have faced increasing legal scrutiny after the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision and recent administrative law decisions limiting agency authority.
For gun owners, the significance extends beyond this single regulation. The decision reinforces a growing judicial skepticism toward federal agencies attempting to expand their authority through administrative rulemaking rather than congressional action.
That trend is becoming increasingly common across multiple areas of federal firearm regulation.
Supreme Court Challenge Targets New York's Gun Industry Liability Law
Another major Second Amendment battle may soon arrive at the Supreme Court. A challenge to New York’s law targeting firearm manufacturers and dealers is moving forward, potentially setting up a showdown over whether states can sidestep federal protections for the firearms industry.
The law attempts to create liability pathways allowing lawsuits against firearm manufacturers and dealers for the criminal misuse of firearms by third parties. Supporters argue the measure provides accountability.
Opponents argue it directly conflicts with the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), the federal law designed specifically to prevent firearm companies from being held liable for crimes committed by unrelated individuals.
This issue matters enormously. Without PLCAA protections, firearm manufacturers could face endless lawsuits for criminal acts they neither committed nor controlled. Imagine suing an automobile manufacturer because someone drove drunk. Or suing a knife company because a criminal used a kitchen knife in a crime. The legal principle is essentially the same.
If the Supreme Court eventually takes the case, the outcome could determine whether anti-gun states can use litigation as a backdoor method of attacking the firearms industry when legislative restrictions fail. The stakes could hardly be higher.
Final Thoughts
The fight for the Second Amendment is continuing to ramp up week to week. The fight over the Second Amendment is increasingly moving from legislative chambers into courtrooms. We are seeing this in a multitude of states and court rooms across the country.
This is an exciting time in the world of the Second Amendment. We are finally after decades seeing positive movement towards restoration of rights and not just restricting. That does not mean that results are coming fast or easily, but they are trickling in.
We have the opportunity finally to get these important constitutional questions answered and ruled on while they were often ignored in the past. The post-Bruen legal environment continues forcing governments to justify firearm restrictions in ways they have not had to for decades.
The next few months could bring some of the most important Second Amendment rulings in years. Staying right here with 2 If By Sea Tactical is how you can stay up to date on all of it.
Here at 2 If By Sea Tactical we strive to bring you the best experience in the firearms world. As we continue to grow the media arm of 2 If By Sea, make sure you keep tuning in to our Youtube and Rumble channels and right here at “The Patriot’s Almanac” to stay informed on the latest happenings in the firearm world! But we are not lawyers, so this isn’t legal guidance. We are proud to be Southern Minnesota source for all things 2A.
Stay sharp, stay informed, and stay ready.
