Backdoor Gun Control Emerging in Pennsylvania
0
0
0
Anti-gun lawmakers are once again advancing legislation that, on its surface, sounds administrative—but could have serious long-term Second Amendment implications. In Pennsylvania, House Democrats are moving forward with HB 2018, introduced by Representative Hanbidge, which would create a “Domestic Violence Fatality Review Board.”
The bill is scheduled for consideration in the House Judiciary Committee. While framed as a data-review and prevention measure, the structure of the proposal raises concerns among gun rights advocates. This would establish a group of unelected officials determining the statuses of constitutionally protected rights. While no one wants domestic violence to happen, every law must be juxtaposed against the constitution and punishment must be to those committing the crime only.
What HB 2018 Would Do
The bill would establish a centralized review board with expanded authority to gather and analyze information from:
Law enforcement
Courts
Social service agencies
Other government entities
The board would then issue reports and make recommendations, including proposed “changes in legislation, regulations, and policies.” On paper, that may sound procedural. In practice, similar boards in other states have often served as launching pads for additional firearm restrictions.
Why Gun Owners Are Paying Attention
Historically, centralized review bodies like this tend to follow a predictable pattern: Data Collection → Narrative Framing → Legislative Pressure → Expanded Gun Control. This is because they go in with the agenda of restrictions and not solutions while maintain the 2nd Amendment.
Concerns raised by critics include the possibility that future reports could:
Define “system failures” as insufficient firearm confiscation
Argue background checks are inadequate
Push expansion of Protection From Abuse (PFA) firearm surrender rules
Promote Red Flag-style firearm confiscation orders
Recommend expanding prohibited-person categories
Treat lawful firearm access as a “risk factor”
The language allowing the board to recommend legislative changes is particularly significant. Once institutionalized, such boards can become permanent policy drivers.
The Bigger Picture
Across the country, we are seeing increasingly sophisticated approaches to firearm regulation. Instead of direct bans, some lawmakers are building administrative frameworks that can later justify new restrictions. This isn’t always about immediate prohibition—it’s about laying groundwork.
Whether in Pennsylvania, Virginia, New Mexico, or elsewhere, the strategy often looks similar: build the data structure first, then use it to argue for expanded government authority later.
At 2 If By Sea Tactical, Southern Minnesota’s premier indoor range and firearms store, we monitor developments like this because legislative trends don’t stay confined to one state. Gun owners must stay informed and engaged. Policies framed as public safety measures can quickly evolve into broader restrictions on lawful ownership and self-defense rights.
Now more than ever, vigilance matters. Stay up to date on all things Second Amendment right here at 2 If By Sea Tactical — where we stand for responsible gun ownership, informed citizens, and the preservation of constitutional rights.
Here at 2 If By Sea Tactical we strive to bring you the best experience in the firearms world. As we continue to grow the media arm of 2 If By Sea, make sure you keep tuning in to our Youtube and Rumble channels and right here at “The Patriot’s Almanac” to stay informed on the latest happenings in the firearm world! But we are not lawyers, so this isn't legal guidance. We are proud to be Southern Minnesota source for all things 2A.
Stay sharp, stay informed, and stay ready.
