West Virginia Machine Gun Bill Stalled — But the Fight Isn’t Over
- Austin Reville
- 4 days ago
- 4 min read
Earlier this week, a groundbreaking Second Amendment bill in West Virginia was stopped before reaching a full vote — but the effort to restore firearm rights is far from finished. Senate Bill 1071, introduced by Chris Rose, would have created the Public Defense and Provisioning Act, allowing the State of West Virginia to legally transfer machine guns to qualified, law-abiding citizens through a state-run program.
The legislation relied on a long-standing exemption within federal law that allows machine gun transfers “to or by” a state, opening the door for states to restore access to modern arms that have effectively been banned for civilians since the 1986 Hughes Amendment. For many Second Amendment advocates, SB 1071 represented one of the boldest state-level challenges yet to federal firearm restrictions.
What Happened to the Bill
The bill successfully passed through the Senate Judiciary Committee after being pushed forward by Tom Willis, who worked to ensure the legislation received a proper hearing and vote. The committee approved the measure by a strong margin.
However, according to reports from lawmakers, Randy Smith prevented the bill from moving forward to the next stage of the legislative process. That decision effectively halted the bill — at least for now. For gun owners who were watching the legislation closely, the move was frustrating. But it does not necessarily mean the effort is finished.
A Path Forward Still Exists
Even though SB 1071 stalled in the Senate, its language could still be revived. One common legislative strategy is to amend the language of a stalled bill into another piece of legislation that is already moving through the process. This allows lawmakers to continue debating the proposal and potentially bring it to a vote.
For that to happen, however, lawmakers need to hear from their constituents. Grassroots pressure has historically played a major role in advancing Second Amendment legislation — and this situation may be no different.
Addressing Criticism of the Bill
Some critics have suggested the legislation was rushed or legally questionable. According to those involved in drafting it, that claim simply isn’t accurate. The bill language was reviewed by attorneys working with Gun Owners of America before it was introduced. Similar legislative language has also been used by T.J. Roberts in a comparable proposal introduced in Kentucky.
Additionally, the bill passed the standard legislative review process required for introduction in the West Virginia legislature. In other words, this was not a hastily assembled proposal — it was a carefully developed effort designed to operate within existing federal law.
Questions About Behind-the-Scenes Pressure
Recent reporting by firearms journalist John Crump has also raised concerns about possible lobbying pressure surrounding the bill. According to lawmakers who spoke with Crump, a lobbyist allegedly urged legislators to oppose SB 1071 while implying he was representing the National Rifle Association (NRA).
However, when Crump contacted NRA leadership directly, they reportedly clarified that the individual had not worked for the organization for several years and that the NRA is not opposed to the bill. If accurate, those reports raise questions about whether lawmakers may have been given misleading information during the legislative process.
Support from the Governor
It’s also worth noting that West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey has expressed support for the concept behind the legislation and remains supportive of restoring the full scope of Second Amendment rights for law-abiding citizens. That support could become important if the bill — or similar language — eventually reaches the governor’s desk.
Why This Matters
SB 1071 was about more than one piece of legislation. It represented a broader effort to challenge decades-old federal restrictions that many Second Amendment advocates believe are unconstitutional.
For years, Americans have been told that modern machine guns are permanently out of reach for civilian ownership. But the language of federal law suggests states may have more authority than many realize. West Virginia’s proposal aimed to test that possibility.
If American Gun Owners truly want rollbacks from federal unconstitutional restrictions, the fight will have to be won in the states. There are more pro-gun (assuming politicians in charge of these states are not just paying lip service) states than anti-gun ones. The fight to roll back federal overreach will be within the states. If enough states band together, they can nullify or completely overturn federal law. That is the beauty of a Republic.
Stay Engaged
Although SB 1071 did not advance this week, the opportunity to revive the legislation still exists. If you live in West Virginia, consider contacting your state legislators and urging them to explore options for reintroducing the bill’s language into other legislation.
Public pressure and grassroots engagement have often been the deciding factors in whether pro-Second Amendment bills move forward. At 2 If By Sea Tactical, we will continue watching this story closely. The fight to restore the full scope of the right to keep and bear arms doesn’t end with one setback — and in West Virginia, it may only be getting started.
Here at 2 If By Sea Tactical we strive to bring you the best experience in the firearms world. As we continue to grow the media arm of 2 If By Sea, make sure you keep tuning in to our Youtube and Rumble channels and right here at “The Patriot’s Almanac” to stay informed on the latest happenings in the firearm world! But we are not lawyers, so this isn't legal guidance. We are proud to be Southern Minnesota source for all things 2A.
Stay sharp, stay informed, and stay ready.
Comments